• CSC tag_orngBlu
  • Conference
      • About
        • About the Conference
        • Floor Plan / Sponsor List
        • Sponsors
        • FAQ
        • Contact Us
        • Health & Safety
      • Hotel & Travel
        • Hotel Accomodations
        • Travel Information
      • Attend
        • Why Attend?
        • Registration & Pricing
        • Agenda At-A-Glance
        • Conference Schedule
        • MCLE Accreditation
        • Speakers
        • Speaker Resources
      • Sponsor
        • Why Sponsor?
        • Sponsor / Inquire
        • Sponsor Resource Center
        • Sponsorship & Advertising
  • News
    • Latest News
  • Subscribe
    • Newsletter Signup
  • .
  • Conference
    • About
      • About the Conference
      • Floor Plan / Sponsor List
      • Sponsors
      • FAQ
      • Contact Us
      • Health & Safety
    • Attend
      • Why Attend?
      • Registration & Pricing
      • Agenda At-A-Glance
      • Conference Schedule
      • MCLE Accreditation
      • Speakers
      • Speaker Resources
    • Sponsor
      • Why Sponsor?
      • Sponsor / Inquire
      • Sponsor Resource Center
      • Sponsorship & Advertising
    • Hotel & Travel
      • Hotel Accomodations
      • Travel Information
  • News
    • Latest News
  • Subscribe
    • Newsletter Signup

December 9-11, 2025
Hyatt Regency Coconut Point, Bonita Springs, FL

Register Sponsor
Q

Latest News

July 27, 2017

The Spearin Doctrine Explained

Latest News
Economic Forecasts | Ethics and Compliance | Infrastructure and Transportation | Insurance and Surety | Latest News | Litigation Strategies/Dispute Resolution | News | Risk & Contract Management | Workforce and Labor
July 27, 2017

The Spearin Doctrine Explained

A short history of the Spearin Doctrine

The Spearin Doctrine, or the doctrine of implied warranty of adequacy, is one of most basic tenets of construction law.

It was first established in United States v. Spearin (248 U.S. 132) in 1918.

Matthew DeVries, writing in BEST PRACTICES CONSTRUCTION LAW, provided a brief summary of the doctrine after reading “about a recent case where the Missouri Court of Appeals formally adopted the Spearin Doctrine.”

Spearin contracted with the federal government to “build a dry-dock in the Brooklyn Naval Yard.” To accomplish this, he relocated a sewer line that ran underneath the pad for the dock. This was done according to the plans and specifications provided by the owner (the federal government.)

A year later, after the work had been “approved and accepted… a dam in a connecting sewer caused flooding in the area excavated for the dry-dock.”

The government filed suit claiming Spearin failed to properly investigate site conditions.

Spearin countered that he relied upon the information provided him by the government, which did not show the existence of the dam, and that it was reasonable for him to do so.

The U. S. Supreme court agreed with Spearin. “‘…if the contractor is bound to build according to plans and specifications prepared by the owner, the contractor will not be responsible for the consequences of defects in the plans and specifications. This responsibility of the owner is not overcome by the usual clause requiring builders to visit the site, to check the plans, and to inform themselves of the requirements of the work…the contractor should be relieved, if he was misled by erroneous statements in the specifications.”

Mr. DeVries notes that there are now limitations to the rule, established by the Ohio Supreme Court ruling in Dugan & Meyers Construction Co. v. Ohio Dept. of Administrative Services. Here the court ruled that “the Spearin Doctrine did not apply to cases involving delays due to design changes if a contract contains a ‘no damages for delay” clause.”

Source—

Spearin Doctrine: A Construction Case Described in A Tweet! Matthew DeVries,

BEST PRACTICES CONSTRUCTION LAW, July 6, 2017.

United States v. Spearin, Wikipedia

Economic Forecasts•Ethics and Compliance•Infrastructure and Transportation•Insurance and Surety•Latest News•Litigation Strategies/Dispute Resolution•News•Risk & Contract Management•Workforce and Labor

SHARE

Share on Email
Share on Linkedin
Share on Facebook
Share on Pinterest
Share on Twitter
← Previous Article Next Article →
Latest News Latest NewsNews

Construction Spending Decreases by 0.3 Percent

It's the largest year-over-year decrease since February 2019, according to an analysis by the AGC.

Latest News Latest NewsNews

Workforce Planning will Attract AI and Automation

New report reveals that 98% of construction leaders plan to use AI, automation, and analytics for workforce planning.

Latest News Latest NewsNews

Construction Spending Decreases by 0.3 Percent

It's the largest year-over-year decrease since February 2019, according to an analysis by the AGC.

Latest News Latest NewsNews

Changing Attitudes Toward Mental Health

Has the level of awareness increased when it comes to the importance of mental health among construction attorneys?

Latest News Latest NewsNews

Tariff Survey – Reshoring?

A recent survey of industrial/manufacturing sector execs found Less than 10% of U.S. companies have reshored production in response to tariffs.

Latest News Latest NewsNews

Circumventing Limitation of Liability Clauses – Long Shot?

An attempt to circumvent a limitation of liability clause usually starts with an allegation of gross negligence.

Latest News Latest NewsNews

Construction Spending Declines 0.5 Percent

Construction spending decreased 0.5 percent from Feb to March with a pullback in the largest nonresidential public and private projects.

Latest News Latest NewsNews

Trials and Tribulations – Q&A With Marion Hack

While the majority of construction law disputes are settled out of court, the skill of arguing before a jury is still a valued talent—even an art.

SHOW INFORMATION

SIGN UP

Register now for the opportunity to connect with thousands of atttendees and vendors

Register
Sponsor / Inquire
FOLLOW US ON
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
Emerald Logo
© 2025 Emerald X, LLC. All Rights Reserved
ABOUTCAREERSAUTHORIZED SERVICE PROVIDERSYour Privacy ChoicesTERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY