Imprecise Contract Language Precludes Additional Insured Coverage
There’s a difference between “for whom” and “with whom.” Contractor know that insurance companies will peruse provisions in…
July 27Latest in: Litigation Strategies/Dispute Resolution
The Spearin Doctrine Explained
A short history of the Spearin Doctrine The Spearin Doctrine, or the doctrine of implied warranty of adequacy,…
July 27Responsibility for Jobsite Safety Can Be Determined by Contract Provisions
Contract provisions can override the general rule. General contractors are not usually held responsible for the well-being of…
July 27Opinion—Federal Agencies Threaten Our Democracy
The unchecked power of Federal agencies is a far greater threat to our democracy than most people realize…
July 5Precise Language in an Indemnity Provision is Essential
A California court rules that contract language take precedence over the doctrine of equitable indemnity. The California Court…
July 5Excess Insurer can be Sued by Policyholder for Failure to Cover a Claim
The Ninth Circuit rejects an excess insurer’s arguments that it’s not liable for a claim against the insured…
July 5VA Officials Will Not Be Prosecuted for Cost Overruns
No one is to be held responsible for budget overruns for a VA hospital that will cost three…
July 5A Classic Case of Quantum Meruit
Illinois Appellate Court rules in favor of defendant in a quantum meruit claim. Brandon Carter, writing in the…
July 4CSC 2017 Offers More Sessions, More Speakers, More Credits
“The conference submissions we received and the conference developed by our outstanding advisory board stand to make this…
June 1Opinion—Just How Draconian are the Budgetary Cuts to Federal Agencies?
The answer is based upon one’s perspective Now that Mr. Trump is president his actions and the actions…
June 1